A Publication of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland
Catholic Voice Online Edition
Front Page In this Issue Around the Diocese Forum News in Brief Calendar Commentary
Mission Statement
Contact Us
Publication Dates
Back Issues

Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland

Movie Reviews

Mass Times

Catholic Voice
articles list
placeholder Bishop-elect Barber
from those who
know him

New bishop reflects
on his journey
to Oakland

Three Voice editors
reflect on challenges

Voice's Tony
Maurovich retiring
after 50-year career

in The Catholic Voice

How The Voice
gets to you

Sister Carmel Curry, DC

Sister Patricia Gilligan, CSJ

Ecumenical leaders
encouraged by
Archbishop Brunett
at meeting

Eagle Scout collects
items for US troops

Catholic cemeteries
observe Memorial

Honoring mothers
in heaven

School encourages
Church in media

Boston cardinal
to boycott college

placeholder May 20, 2013   •   VOL. 51, NO. 10   •   Oakland, CA
Three Voice editors reflect on challenges

Rev. Richard Mangini

Developing lay people
Rev. Richard Mangini
Editor, November 1972-December 1979
Pastor, St. Bonaventure Parish, Concord

I have been ordained now for 46 years, and I tell people often that I don't remember very much about three-quarters of it. I know that I have worked long and hard at being the good instrument of God's presence and grace that I could be. Often I have wondered about all the people whose lives that I have entered and helped, hopefully, along their spiritual journey.

I have enjoyed and prospered in a career path in the Catholic Church that has been very fulfilling to me as a priest and very interesting and diverse, as editor of a Catholic newspaper, a pastoral planner for the diocese, an organizer of a papal event and the anniversary of a diocese, and twice as a pastor.

I have lived in the robust days of the beginning of the Second Vatican Council and have been part of all the developments and fruits of the great beginning of Church renewal focusing on developing the spirituality of lay people and calling them into ministry in the church and the world.

That was my principal focus as second editor of the Catholic Voice. The first editor, Msgr. Frank Maurovich, sought me out to replace him. While honored and while given the opportunity to attend the Graduate School of Journalism at the University of California at Berkeley, I never had the printer's ink in my blood as Frank had. Learning about journalism and doing it were two different things. I remember the long days and nights poring over the Catholic news services, trying to figure out what to put together from week to week.

Looking back on that period of my life, I believe that I am more an adult education director than an editor. While I tried to chronicle all the developing stories of an emerging new church of God's people, I was also teaching about parish life, pastoral councils, liturgy, prayer, spirituality and social justice. I was editor in the exciting years of 1973-1980, in the last years of our first bishop, Floyd L. Begin, and in the first years of our second bishop, John S. Cummins. In the middle of those years, I was asked to serve as an interim pastor at St. Charles Borromeo Parish in Livermore and as pastor of St. Leander Church in San Leandro. My first love was the living and development of the pastoral life of the Parish. So, I needed to be free of the responsibilities of administrating and directing a newspaper.

I was able to hand on the newspaper to our first lay editor. That was a development itself and a sign of the new times in the Church — from a traditional place for a priest to be in the hierarchy of a chancery office to the first lay editor of The Catholic Voice!

Dan Morris-Young

Making news relevant
Dan Morris-Young
Editor, December 1979 to May 1986

In the early 1980s while editor of The Voice, I wrote a brief reflection on the life and death of a tadpole that my children had collected from a pond on the Redemptorists' campus on Golf Links Road in east Oakland. In retrospect, it highlights perhaps the core challenge of my time at the newspaper.

Over a matter of days the tadpole had morphed before our eyes into a tiny, lovely, emerald green frog.

The kids decorated its Tupperware swamp with rocks and marbles. But, the frog died. Heather, Jon, Joe and Mike were devastated. We held a funeral using a matchbox as a coffin. We read aloud from Genesis. The event spoke of the holy in the every day, in the ordinary, in the eyes of children.

No false modesty: The tadpole reflection was no great shakes. However, to my utter surprise it created one of the most extensive reader reactions to anything I recall authoring, editing or assigning.

More feedback and readership, I think, than what I still judge to have been important and in-depth reports and analysis of what the United States was doing in Central America at that time. More than our interviews with high-octane theologians from Hans Kung and Sandra Schneiders to Edward Schillebeeckx and Gustavo Gutiérrez. More than our coverage of the nuclear threats and of widespread famine. (Might you remember the extensive amount of money donated by readers through The Voice for famine relief?)

The Voice is a platform for reporting and for exchange on world, regional and local events. But, my friends, there is no doubt in my mind that what happens in family, in school, in neighborhood and in parish is what moves most of us most of the time.

The long success of Jim Dempsey's "salad bowl" column, Around the Diocese, speaks to that. We would receive large numbers of "small" news items — anniversaries, car washes, etc. — for which we simply did not have space. Jim, however, would knit handfuls of these into an incredibly readable column with tons of names, dates and facts. Readership evaluations and anecdotal feedback consistently told us Jim's column ranked right there with letters to the editor as the places Voice readers went most often: family, school, neighborhood, parish.

Thus, the fundamental challenge for myself and our editorial staff was to make the often less personal broad issues — justice, immigration, foreign policy, church doctrinal tensions and so on — take on a tangibility for our readers' lives. Reporting on the murders of four churchwomen by El Salvadoran National Guardsmen in December 1980, for example, is one thing. Helping that story take on compelling meaning in and for the lives of readers is another.

Monica Clark

Remaining faithful
Monica Clark
Editor, May 1986 to December 2010

Looking back on my greatest challenges as Voice editor, the first things that came to mind were the 1989 earthquake (which occurred while I was on a press tour in Jerusalem) and the Oakland Hills fire in 1991 (days after I returned to work after cancer treatment). Yes, these disasters required quick and thorough reporting during somewhat trying circumstances. But coverage of such news is what journalists do.

The far greater challenge for me was how to remain faithful in every edition to the underlying principles of Catholic journalism, drawn from three documents: the Vatican II Decree on the Means of Social Communication (1963), the 1971 Pastoral Instruction on the Means of Social Communication, and the Catholic Press Association's document, Freedom and Responsibility in the Catholic Press.

This meant finding ways to report fully, fairly and accurately on events in the Oakland diocese and the global Church, including accounts that addressed weaknesses as well as strengths. I strongly believe that parishioners prefer the truth, even when it is disturbing.

It meant fostering a thoughtful dialog on issues, especially through the Readers' Forum, which, according to our periodic readership surveys, was always the best read page of the paper. Here was the opportunity for parishioners to listen to the voices of their fellow Catholics whose opinions or insights might differ strongly from their own. Fortunately, there was always a variety of submissions to fill the page.

It meant selecting stories and photos that reflected both the unity and diversity in the diocese, working hard to achieve balance in terms of men/women, ages, ethnicities, and theological perspectives, and to be aware of the danger of being too Oakland-centric.

It meant confronting the possibility of self-censorship out of fear of criticism or retribution. Certainly there were times when irate readers and unhappy pastors called to complain about some story we had published. Only once did I get a death threat.

In looking back over my tenure, I wish I'd had more courage, knowledge and skill to report on clergy sex abuse, especially in the early days of the crisis. I wish, too, that I had dug deeper into the theological divide that emerged after Vatican II to help readers achieve a fuller understanding of the council's teachings.

My ultimate challenge was how to contribute to the common good of the people of the Oakland Diocese while being neither institutional cheerleader nor skeptical outsider.

back to topup arrow


Copyright © 2013 The Catholic Voice, All Rights Reserved. Site design by Sarah Kalmon-Bauer.