| By
Gerald D. Coleman, S.S.
On July 18,
by a vote of 63 to 37, the U.S. Senate approved legislation that would
expand federal support of medical research using embryonic stem cells.
This legislation also promoted efforts to obtain stem cells from non-embryonic
sources, and prohibited soliciting or receiving tissue from pregnancies
initiated simply to provide material for research.
This legislation permitted research only on stem cells derived from human
embryos that would be discarded, e.g., in the process of in vitro fertilization.
President Bush vetoed this legislation the same week it was passed.
Bush’s decision was variously portrayed as a position against treatment
of disease, as standing in the way of progress, and as bowing to pressure
from religious extremists.
Judgments about embryonic stem cell research have raged now for about
seven years, with intractable positions being taken, with little hope
for resolution.
How are faithful Catholics to navigate this rapidly changing scientific
and legislative landscape? (See “Making Decisions about Embryonic
Stem Cell Research” by M. Therese Lysaught, in “Making Health
Care Decisions: A Catholic Guide,” Liguori Press, 2006.) Are Catholics
“religious extremists” when they disapprove of embryonic stem
cell research?
What should we know?
What is a stem cell? Stem cells form in the earliest stages of human development
after a fertilized egg begins to divide. After 7 or 8 divisions, the blastocyst
is formed, a sphere made up of an outer layer which will become the placenta,
and the remaining cells cluster to one side of the blastocyst.
These cells are all the same as they have not yet started to “differentiate,”
or become the different tissues that make up the human body. These “undifferentiated”
cells are human embryonic cells.
Because these cells can develop into any type of tissue in the human body,
it is argued that human embryonic cells have the potential to provide
scientific and medical benefits, e.g., use for transplantation purposes
to replace damaged tissue for diseases like Parkinson’s, juvenile
diabetes, spinal cord injury.
In the Senate legislation, stem cells would be obtained from embryos created
in the process of in vitro fertilization.
The process entails the removal of the nucleus of an embryo (enucleated),
which automatically destroys the embryo. Then a cell, e.g., a skin cell,
is taken from the body of an adult patient. The nucleus of this skin cell
is also removed, and then transferred into the enucleated ovum. The ovum
is stimulated with an electric charge, chemicals, and hormones, and the
materials from the two different cells fuse.
This ovum now has a full complement of genes and it begins to act like
it has been fertilized. This embryo is then used as a source of stem cells
that would be the exact genetic match to the patient who donated the skin
cell.
Why is the Catholic Church (and others) against this type of biomedical
research?
In accord with sound scientific knowledge, the Church holds that a human
life is present from the time when conception is complete (fertilization).
At conception, a new human life comes into existence with its own unique
DNA. If unhampered, this fertilized ovum will grow into a full human being.
An embryo is not a “potential” human life. It is a human being.
To deliberately destroy this embryo amounts to taking a new human life.
These moral factors are important in understanding this complex issue:
• Embryos are human life. A blastocyst is not simply human tissue
or a cluster of cells.
• Blastocysts and embryos are living subjects with a right to life
whose dignity is to be respected from fertilization to death.
• At conception, a unique individual is created, one with a unique
genetic endowment that organizes and guides the expression of both its
shared human dignity and its own individual character.
The Catholic Church has long been in the forefront of the human obligation
to heal and care for the sick. The Church has long supported and promoted
scientific research for the benefit of humanity.
For these reasons, the Church is not opposed, and in fact encourages,
further research on adult stem cells found in all tissues in the human
body, e.g., in the liver, brain, bone marrow. These stem cells can be
cultivated and used for therapeutic purposes
Adult stem cells have been used therapeutically for over 40 years. What
was once termed a “bone marrow transplant” is now referred
to as a “stem cell transplant” because the therapeutic agent
in the transplant consists in stem cells in the bone marrow.
This type of therapeutic potential of adult stem cells has also been demonstrated
in the treatment of such diseases as diabetes, advanced kidney cancer
and heart disease. Time magazine’s overview of this subject
in its July 24 issue is thus of great import, “…Adult stem
cells may be more elastic than scientists thought, and could offer shortcuts
to treatment that embryonic cells can’t match.”
(Sulpician Father Gerald D. Coleman is a lecturer in moral theology
at Santa Clara University.)
|
|
|