A Publication of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland  
Catholic Voice Online Edition  
Front Page In this Issue Around the Diocese Letters Bishop's Column News in Brief Calendar
   
Mission Statement
Contact Us
advertise
Circulation
Publication Dates
Back Issues

  July 4, 2005 VOL. 43, NO. 13Oakland, CA

placeholder
articles list
placeholder

Sacramento settles suits for $35 million

Pope unveils digest of teaching that he prepared as a cardinal

Aide wants John Paul beatified by August

Filipinos grieve the death of Manila’s Cardinal Jaime Sin

Religious share jubilee reflections

Parish sustains hospital outreach for 50 years

Democrats for Life of America expands to northern California

Churches urged to prepare for retirement storm

Bay Area Sisters
honor lay woman
for service to elders

Beyond Bingo’ forum
to focus on health and
happiness for elders

Post-abortion retreat offers healling and support, July 29-31

Holy Names Sister elected president of scholars’ assn.


COMMENTARY

Our Lady of Refuge is patroness of both Californias

Getting a progress report – for prayer?

U.S. ambassador to Vatican set the 'gold standard' for diplomacy


OBITUARY
Deacon Leo Edgerly, Sr.

Sister Mercedes, OCD


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

placeholder

COMMENTARY

•Our Lady of Refuge is patroness of both Californias

•Getting a progress report—for prayer?

U.S. ambassador to Vatican set the ‘gold standard’ for diplomacy

 

PhotoOur Lady of Refuge is patroness of both Californias

In a side altar niche inside the Santa Clara Mission church a painting reveals the Blessed Mother and Infant Jesus side by side, their crowned heads inclined toward one another. Both look outward, towards the viewer.

Their appearance is to portray Our Lady of Refuge, the patroness of California, from the Oregon border to the tip of the Baja peninsula, a patronage that spans the frontier. She has held the title, Patroness of Both Californias, since 1843, and her feast is still celebrated here today - on July 5 in Alta (Upper) California and July 4 in Baja.

The first Bishop of the Californias, Francisco Garcia Diego y Moreno, proclaimed Our Lady of Refuge patroness of the new diocese on Jan. 4, 1843 at Mission Santa Clara. “With so great a patroness and protectress what can we not promise ourselves?” he wrote in the proclamation. “What can be wanting and whom can we fear?”

Bishop Garcia Diego adopted a coat of arms that included nothing more than the image of Our Lady of Refuge, and after his proclamation her image graced each mission church. The paintings were usually the work of a local or native artist.

All California missions and the parishes established later celebrated her patronal feast with great solemnity, but over the years, with political and historical shifts, the practice waned. It was revived in 1982 when the Vatican approved a request from the California Catholic Conference of Bishops to observe her feast day as an obligatory memorial.

During the last century and a half, the original Diocese of Both Californias was divided many times on both sides of the border as the local Church grew, but the image of Our Lady of Refuge remains as a reminder of that early moment of Church history.

Until the end of the 19th century, priests in the Archdiocese of San Francisco prayed a special liturgical office for the feast of Our Lady of Refuge. The feast has always been observed in the Diocese of San Diego.

The original painting of Our Lady of Refuge came to the Franciscan College of Zacatecas in Mexico from Italy via an Italian Jesuit missionary. Devotion to the Mother of Jesus under this title and this pictorial representation gained wide popularity among the Mexican and Californian Franciscans and the people they served.

The proper name Refugio is still given to both male and female Mexican children at the time of birth and baptism, and her feast is still celebrated with its own proper prayers for the Eucharistic Liturgy and the Liturgy of the Hours.

back to topup arrow


Getting a progress report—for prayer?


I hate to admit it, but sometimes I wonder if I’m making any progress in my prayer life. I study about prayer, teach about prayer, and write about prayer, but am I really praying very well or just blabbing about it? Am I growing any closer to God? How could I tell one way or the other?

I’ve been warned in the past—and by people who should know—that there are dangers in becoming too obsessed with trying to figure out one’s spiritual progress. Older spirituality manuals spoke of stages of the spiritual life as various rungs on a ladder ascending to union with God in heaven. Get too caught up in how high you’ve ascended, and you run the risk of pride or a general holier-than-thou attitude.

Nevertheless, I believe there is a time, every now and then, when we should take stock of our prayer lives. Why? Because prayer is about relationship, our relationship with God, and even the best relationships can turn sour when we don’t nurture them. Friends can grow distant and marriages can gradually fall apart when not tended to lovingly. We don’t measure relationships in terms of grades or statistics, but relationships can develop deeper intimacy, oneness, and love—or die out from neglect.

Some people think that pleasant, happy, or exciting feelings during prayer time are signs of progress. Not so. You might be blessed with consolations or a natural high now and then, but this is not necessarily an indication of progress. After all, Jesus experienced great anguish during prayer on the night before he died. Was he regressing in his prayer life?!

Many of us Catholics calculate our net worth in prayer by counting the number of rosaries, litanies, holy hours, or other devotions performed—or, alternately, how many parish meetings, civic activities, and service projects accomplished. (I’m guilty!) Although prayer practices and service to others are good, sheer number of devotions or activities is not the measure of one’s deepening intimacy with God.

Maybe some think if their spiritual life is really flourishing, they will receive whatever they ask for in prayer. Not necessarily—it’s more complicated than that. When Jesus asked God to spare him the pain of the cross, God basically said no.

So, just what are the signs that your prayer life is “working”?
Writer Father Thomas Dubay gathers together classic indicators in his book “Prayer Primer” (Ignatius Press, 2002). If you want to know if your prayer life is improving, think about how you treat other people. Are you gradually becoming more patient and humble? Are you growing in the virtues? Do you exhibit more selfless love and fidelity to the responsibilities of your calling? Do you serve others generously, even people you don’t find interesting or attractive?

A long list of indicators of spiritual progress is also given in “An Introduction to Spiritual Direction” by Father Chester Michael (Paulist Press, 2004). Many of these relate to attitudes. Are you growing in gratitude, recognizing that all that is good is a gift from God? Do you have greater trust in God? How about more self-control? Do you yearn more for God? Are you open to changing old ways of thinking, acting, judging, and speaking?

It’s important to note that spiritual maturation does not happen overnight. Think back one year, five years, or even ten years when pondering the above questions. Growth in even one area is forward movement.

Above all, progress in prayer is measured in terms of love. Christian “perfection consists chiefly in charity,” writes classic Catholic author Father Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange. It’s not about the number of college degrees, volunteer hours, or warm fuzzy feelings, but the intensity of compassion for others.

“God is love,” proclaims St. John the Apostle, “and those who abide in love abide in God, and God abides in them” (1 John 4:16). Love is the true measuring rod of prayer because God is love, and communion with this loving God is the true aim of prayer.(Julie McCarty is a freelance writer from Eagan, Minn., whose syndicated column on prayer appears in diocesan newspapers around the country. Contact her at soulwriting@yahoo.com. )

back to topup arrow


PhotoU.S. ambassador to Vatican set the ‘gold standard’ for diplomacy

Sometime in the next few months, a new U.S. ambassador to the Holy See will be moving into Villa Richardson on Rome’s Janiculum Hill. The shoes waiting to be filled there, and at the U.S. embassy to the Holy See (which overlooks the Circus Maximus),
are large indeed.

Since the post was created during the first Reagan administration, Americans of all faiths and political persuasions have been well-served by their ambassadors to the Holy See: a distinguished group of men and women who have brought lives of
accomplishment and good judgment to their work in the Vatican, and with the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See.

Some served in relatively quiet periods; others had to tread a rockier road. Still, I trust none of his distinguished predecessors, no matter what the circumstances in which they served, will object if I suggest
that the recently-returned U.S. ambassador to the Holy See, R. James Nicholson (now Secretary of Veterans Affairs), set a
new standard of excellence.

Jim Nicholson grew up in poverty on a tenant farm in northwest Iowa, knowing hunger in his bones. After graduating from West Point
in 1961, he did eight years of active duty as a paratrooper, qualifying as a Ranger and earning the Bronze Star in Vietnam. He retired from the service with the rank of colonel after
22 years in the Army Reserve.

His active military career was followed by law practice and successful ventures in real estate development; yet Jim Nicholson would likely say that his greatest achievement was persuading Suzanne Marie
Ferrell, a wonderful woman and distinguished artist, to marry him.

They raised three children, even as Jim was becoming involved in politics, becoming Colorado’s representative on the Republican National Committee in 1986. Elected chairman of the RNC in 1997, he served through the tumultuous 2000 election,
after which President Bush nominated him as ambassador to the Holy See.

Ambassador Nicholson presented his credentials to Pope John Paul II days after 9/11, and the years ahead would be dominated
by issues of war and peace. During times of real tension between Vatican officials and the U.S. government, especially in the run-up to the war in Iraq, Jim Nicholson kept his head, kept his cool – and kept the conversation-partners in conversation. It was a remarkable performance that earned the respect of everyone in Rome.

At the same time, he launched a series of initiatives that deepened the conversation between the U.S. government and the Vatican on key global issues of mutual concern.

One of the gravest human rights abuses of the early 21st century is the awful practice of trafficking in persons, usually for purposes
of sexual exploitation. Jim Nicholson brought the trafficking issue to Rome and compelled the representatives of countries
that might prefer to ignore the issue to face it squarely, in all its moral squalor and human drama.

Ambassador Nicholson did the same in addressing the question of genetically-modified foods.

Working with the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Nicholson staged an international conference that usefully challenged European protectionists and western anti-corporate activists more inclined to scratch their ideological itches than to see poor people fed; as the once-poor and hungry Nicholson put it in a sharp op-ed piece in the
International Herald Tribune, there was something very strange about anti-corporate ideologues who seemed to be telling faminestricken Africans that it was “better to die than eat the food that Americans eat every day.”

Whatever their concerns about agricultural globalization, senior Vatican officials seemed to agree. Jim and Suzanne Nicholson were gracious and generous hosts, welcoming a broad cross-section of Americans into their residence (where His Excellency, the ambassador, could sometimes be found at 3 a.m. on Monday mornings, watching Denver Broncos’ games on TV).

At the same time, their ambassadorship was a kind of four-year retreat: every Lenten morning at 7:30 a.m., you could find
the Nicholsons at Mass in the Roman station church of the day.
I say “their” ambassadorship because Jim and Suzanne were a marvelous team. Together, they set the gold standard. All
U.S. Catholics owe them a debt of gratitude for services brilliantly rendered.

(George Weigel is a senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C.)



 

 

The image of Our Lady of Refuge remains on display at most of the 21 missions in Alta California, in the church or museum. Some of the best known are to be found in the church and museum at Santa Clara, Mission Dolores in San Francisco, Mission Santa Barbara, Mission San Carlos Borromeo at Carmel, and Mission San Luis Obispo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See James
Nicholson at a talk at the Center for
American Studies in Rome by American
theologian Michael Novak, Feb. 10,
2003. Nicholson had invited Novak to
argue that the war with Iraq was a “just
war.” However, Novak failed to convince
the Vatican, and Pope John Paul
II sent a special envoy to President Bush
to urge him not to attack Iraq.

RNS PHOTO/CHRIS WARDE-JONES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland

El Heraldo



Movie Reviews

Mass Times



Web
Catholic Voice

 

back to topup arrow

home

 
Copyright © 2005 The Catholic Voice, All Rights Reserved. Site design by Sarah Kalmon-Bauer.